What this opportunity is
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is seeking services related to the housing, care, testing, and data management for confiscated U.S. native turtles to support their repatriation. This opportunity is categorized under NAICS 541940 and is a Sources Sought notice, indicating that the government is gathering information rather than soliciting bids at this time. Small businesses with expertise in wildlife care and management may find this opportunity suitable, particularly those focused on conservation and animal husbandry, as it addresses a critical need in combating illegal turtle trafficking. Interested parties should track this notice for potential future solicitations.
Analysis by Mindy, grounded in the SAM.gov notice.
Description
1
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
International Affairs
Scope of Work – Housing, Care, Testing, Data Management for Confiscated U.S. Native
Turtles to Support Repatriation
1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Summary: The United States contains more species of turtles than any other country –
accounting for approximately 20% of turtle species richness globally. These species face
increasing pressures, particularly from illegal collection and international trade. Demand for U.S.
turtles remains high in East Asian markets for use as pets, food, and medicinal ingredients. While
federal and state law enforcement agencies are skilled at intercepting trafficked turtles, a critical
limiting factor remains: the lack of sufficient capacity to house, evaluate, and safely return
confiscated turtles to the wild. This project addresses that need by piloting a structured turtle
management system in partnership with U.S. States and Tribes, with the goal of responsibly
repatriating turtles to the wild. This effort will enhance the long-term conservation resilience of
native turtle populations and help stop the loss of American wildlife to illegal markets abroad.
Overview: Wildlife professionals broadly agree that U.S. native turtle trafficking volumes
have escalated to crisis levels over the past decade. Large-scale seizures involving hundreds of
turtles are now common. U.S. species most frequently encountered include box turtles, spotted
turtles, and mud and musk turtles, along with other high-risk species such as wood turtles, bog
turtles, and diamondback terrapins. Not only does trafficking undercut domestic conservation
efforts to protect our native wildlife, but it removes important ecological engineers from our
landscapes, responsible for seed dispersal and nutrient cycling.
Federal and state law enforcement agencies devote substantial resources to combating illegal
turtle trafficking. However, seizures involving live turtles require immediate access to
appropriate housing, animal husbandry, and veterinary care. Insufficient space and resources
often force officers to delay seizures, divert operational time to animal placement, or temporarily
house turtles in unsuitable office environments. This gap significantly limits optimal
enforcement.
Short-term care is challenging, but long-term management has become nearly untenable. The
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) created an action
plan, aligned with international guidance, to address immediate turtle care by coordinating a
Wildlife Confiscation Network of zoos, aquaria, and other conservation focused partners. These
institutions, however, are designed to serve only as temporary holding facilities until
investigations conclude and generally lack the capacity to house long-lived species like turtles
for extended periods.
This limitation directly constrains the Service’s ability to address illegal and biologically
unsustainable turtle trade. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop alternative long-term
placement options, including evaluating opportunities for repatriating eligible confiscated native
turtles to the wild.
-- 1 of 8 --
2
2. BACKGROUND
International wildlife trafficking generates billions of dollars in criminal profits annually. This
illegal activity not only depletes wildlife but deeply affects our own communities. Wildlife
trafficking undermines the rule of law, funds transnational criminal organizations, and erodes
profits for legal and sustainable trade. Wildlife trafficking of live animals especially presents
risks for the spread of infectious diseases and invasive species. Further, losing our native species
means weakening the ecosystem services they provide. For turtles, this includes their roles in
nutrient cycling, habitat creation, seed dispersal, and regulation of small vertebrate and
invertebrate populations. Confronting and reducing wildlife trafficking benefits human
communities, including with positive health outcomes for people and animals – consistent with
the principles of an integrated approach to wildlife conservation and human.
Turtles are among the U.S. species most targeted for illegal international trade. The U.S. has long
demonstrated global leadership in turtle conservation, including strong adherence to legal
international trade. As a Party to CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), the U.S. strives to ensure international wildlife trade is not
detrimental to species in the wild, including turtles. In terms of international protections, 47 of
the 61 turtle species native to the U.S. are included in the CITES Appendices. In terms of
domestic protections, 14 native turtle species are listed under the Endangered Species Act, and
many receive further protections under state law.
Due to their decades-long life span, turtles present law enforcement with a uniquely complex and
resource-intensive challenge. Large-scale turtle seizures require both immediate action to rapidly
secure appropriate housing and veterinary care, and long-term management capacity. The current
network of institutions that support confiscated wildlife lacks the resources to provide both
sustained care for seized turtles and temporary holding space for new confiscations while
investigations proceed and forfeiture determinations are made. Under U.S. regulations (50 CFR
Part 12 on seizure and forfeiture procedures), the preferred disposition of confiscated live
wildlife—when safe and appropriate—is release into suitable habitat within the species’
historical U.S. range. Release requires landowner and State approval and may not occur if
disease or public‑health risks exist. Adequate quarantine and comprehensive genetic and
pathogen testing are essential to support informed decision‑making on disposition of these
confiscated specimens.
The Service International Affairs seeks a contractor to provide housing, husbandry, veterinary
services, genetic and infectiou…
Source: SAM.gov, as posted. Verify the current solicitation before responding.