UK-Wide Integrated Waste Management Services (IWMS)

DEPT OF DEFENSE

Notice type
Solicitation
Solicitation #
FA558726R0002
NAICS
562119
PSC
S205
Posted
June 12, 2026
Response due
July 15, 2026
Place of performance
Lakenheath, GB-SFK

What this opportunity is

The Department of Defense is seeking a contractor to provide Integrated Waste Management Services (IWMS) across various U.S. Visiting Forces locations in the UK, including RAF Lakenheath and Mildenhall. This solicitation is suitable for small businesses with capabilities in waste management, particularly those experienced in handling both non-hazardous and hazardous waste. Interested parties should note that this is a competitive solicitation, requiring a focus on past performance evaluations as part of the proposal process.

Analysis by Mindy, grounded in the SAM.gov notice.

Description

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104 . Attachment 5: Past Performance Questionnaire For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7 The 48th Contracting Squadron, Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenheath, United Kingdom (UK) is in the process of competitively selecting a source for UK Wide Integrated Waste Management Servies (IWMS). The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, containers, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform the IWMS described in this performance work statement (PWS) at U.S. Visiting Forces (USVF) locations across the UK. IWMS consists of solid (including recycling), non-hazardous and hazardous liquid waste collections and removal. As of the date of this PWS, USVF locations include RAF Lakenheath, Feltwell, Mildenhall, Alconbury, Blenheim Crescent, Det 6, Croughton, Fairford, Molesworth and Welford. The Contractor shall perform to the standards in the contract, as well as all applicable United Kingdom laws and regulations, international agreements, Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA) and appropriate Final Governing Standards (FGS) or in their absence, the Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document (OEBGD). One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts. Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response by 15 July 2026. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of any negotiations. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to 48CONS.PKB.Refuse@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection. _____________________________________ ESTHER HAMILTON, Contracting Officer, USAF Contracting Officer Enc. Attachment 5 -Past Performance Questionnaire -- 1 of 7 -- For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104 . Attachment 4: Past Performance Questionnaire For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7 Section 1: Contract Identification A. Contractor (Company/Division): B. Contractor Cage Code: C. Contract Number: D. Contract Type (e.g., (Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), etc.): E. Program Title: F. Brief Program Description: G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)): H. Period of Performance 1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________ 2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________ 3. Reason for difference (if applicable): I. Contract Value 1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $/£ 2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $/£ 3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable): J. Description of work performed: K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well. Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification A. Customer or agency name: B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): -- 2 of 7 -- For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104 . Attachment 4: Past Performance Questionnaire For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7 C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands, please state location): Section 3: Respondent Identification A. Respondent’s name: B. Respondent’s title: C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address: D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role: E. Other suggested points of contact: Section 4: Performance Information In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows: Code Performance Rating E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet

Source: SAM.gov, as posted. Verify the current solicitation before responding.

Pursue this opportunity with Mindy

See who holds it now, who else is bidding, and draft your response — grounded in real government data, not generic AI.

View the original notice on SAM.gov ↗

Similar Active Opportunities (NAICS 562119)