Amendment 3 Install Kitchenette Fort Bliss

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW U.S. Army Garrison-Fort Bliss, Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Division (DPW-ED)-NEPA Office Bldg. 624, Fort Bliss, TX 79916 Office Number: 915-568-3782 RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC) Date Received: 4/10/2026 NEPA Log#:26-0329 Review Expires: 4/24/2027 This environmental review, performed under the authority of NEPA, AR 200-1, and the 30 June 2025 DoD Procedures, serves to identify critical compliance requirements. By documenting federal, state, and local legal obligations, this review allows DPW-Environmental to safeguard the installation against regulatory risk and avoid unforeseen budgetary or schedule delays to projects. 1. Scope Limitation: This analysis applies exclusively to the work described in the submitted Work Order and supporting documents. 2. PM Responsibility: The Project Manager/Proponent must resolve all environmental issues prior to project award. Concurrence is predicated on full adherence to this guidance. 3. Review Scope: This document identifies potential environmental impacts but does not constitute a technical approval of final plans, specifications, or drawings. 4. Legal Compliance: The Proponent is responsible for complying with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, and Army policies regardless of whether they are specifically cited herein. 5. Validity & Resubmission: Approval is contingent upon an unchanged Scope of Work. o Work must be completed within 365 days of the review date. o Package resubmission is required if the project changes or the review expires. o The Proponent must ensure all required documentation is submitted to DPW-Environmental. 6. No Regulatory Relief: This review does not exempt or relieve the Proponent from complying with all applicable federal, state, or local environmental or other laws. Proponent will be liable for fines imposed. Proprietary Approval 11B 10116 6P Install kitchenettes at building 2478 that will include a sink with running hot/cold water and upper and lower cabinets with countertops appropriate for food preparation. Install 220v wiring to support electric range and fire suppression system. 4/16/2026  Section III provides critical data regarding environmental requirements necessary for compliance including but not limited to, equipment specifications, abatement/mitigation plans, and SWPPPs. ***Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paint survey for Building 2478*** Section III: Provides Environmental Review and Environmental Screening Checklist: For DPW-ED Subject Matter (SME) Expert Use Only POC FOR THIS ACTION: Leonardo Licon leonardo.licon.civ@army.mil Alternate/DPW POC: NA Previously Reviewed Action: NO Previous NEPA Log#: NA SME Comment Directions 1. Each review comment should be succinct and focused on one area for resolution. The four key parts of a quality review comment normally include: a. Concern Identification – Identify the location of the concern by Specification Section, Drawing Plan Sheet, Drawing Plan Detail, or Document Reference Number. Include paragraph numbers, sentence, and/or line numbers as appropriate. b. Basis for concern – Cite the appropriate law, policy, design criteria, guidance, procedure, risk. c. Significance of concern – Indicate the importance of the concern regarding its potential impact on the project (plan selection, operations, efficiency, cost, effectiveness, risk, safety, Federal interest, or public acceptability). Section I: Outlines Proponent Responsibilities BLUF: Section II: Project Title and Description of Proposed Action: ANTICIPATED PROJECT START DATE: -- 1 of 8 -- DPW-ED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NEPA LOG #26-0329 SCLMR#: NA WO#/Doc ID# #: 11B 10116 6P Doc TYPE#: 95% Design Review Location/Building 2478 Page 2 of 8 d. Resolution of concern Provide the specific action or change required to resolve the issue. If the solution is not yet clear, request follow-up coordination to determine the necessary steps. e. Attachments: Reference any supporting documentation provided, such as surveys, technical data, or required forms, to assist in the resolution. f. Screening Criteria Checklist-Any ‘YES’ or ‘MAYBE’ answers need to be explained in the SME comment section. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM: Cultural Resources-Archeology REVIEWER: Elia Perez CONCURRENCE: YES ATTACHMENT: NA FINALIZED DATE: 4/14/2026 No comment. PROGRAM: Cultural Resources-Historic Preservation REVIEWER: Troy Ainsworth CONCURRENCE: YES ATTACHMENT: NA FINALIZED DATE: 4/15/2026 No comment. PROGRAM: Natural Resources REVIEWER: Gabriel Ramirez CONCURRENCE: YES- WITH COMMENTS CULTURAL RESOURCES-ARCHEOLOGY ANSWER CHOICES a. Will there be any land/ground disturbance or will the proposal be located in, on, or near a known archaeological site? If ‘Yes’ or ‘Maybe’, specify requirements associated with inadvertent discovery of human remains and archaeological work requirements, if any, needed prior to implementing the proposal (for example, Antiquities Act, NAGPRA, NHPA). ☐ YES ☒ NO ☐ MAYBE LAND USE-SPECIAL DESIGNATION AREAS b. Will the proposal affect any special designation or recognition area, whether on-post or off- post (for example, National Park, World Heritage Site, and so forth)? If ‘Yes’ or ‘Maybe’, summarize encumbrances and, as appropriate, provide applicable references. ☐ YES ☒ NO ☐ MAYBE c. Is the proposal located on an area with land use encumbrances (for example, archeological zones, and so forth)? If ‘Yes’ or ‘Maybe’, summarize encumbrances and, as appropriate, provide applicable references. ☐ YES ☒ NO ☐ MAYBE CULTURAL RESOURCES-HISTORIC PRESERVATION ANSWER CHOICES a. Will the proposal involve alterations of existing buildings or structures? X YES ☐ NO ☐ MAYBE b. Will the proposal affect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places? If ˜Yes”or˜Maybe” specify if mitigation of adverse effects, if a…